SCAFFOLDING STRATEGIES: AN ACTION RESEARCH STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF SCAFFOLDING IN READING AND STUDENT MOTIVATION
Archivos
Fecha
2022-05-24
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Jaén: Universidad de Jaén
Resumen
[ES] El presente estudio de investigación-acción implementado a cincuenta y seis estudiantes de Ingles como Lengua Extranjera de una universidad privada Ecuatoriana reporta en cuanto a los efectos de metodologías AICLE, como es el aprendizaje de andamiaje, como un factor de motivación en la lectura de alumnos y como una herramienta para mejorar su rendimiento en actividades de lectura comprensiva. Los sujetos fueron separados en dos grupos durante el periodo académico en el cual fueron monitoreados, los grupos experimental (con proceso de andamiaje) y de control (sin proceso de andamiaje). El análisis de los resultados revelan que el grupo experimental mejoró sus habilidades de comprensión lectora como resultado de las técnicas de andamiaje. Las entrevistas post-estudio también resultaron favorables y los estudiantes reportaron que se sintieron motivados durante el proceso.
[EN] The present action research study implemented to fifty-six EFL learners in a private Ecuadorian University reports into the effects that CLIL methodologies such as scaffolding have as a motivating factor in students’ reading comprehension skills. The subjects were separated into two groups during the academic term in which they were monitored, the experimental (scaffolded) and the control (non-scaffolded) groups. The analysis of the results reveal that the experimental group improved their reading comprehension skills as a result of the scaffolding techniques. The post-study interview also resulted favorable and students reported to have felt motivated during the process.
[EN] The present action research study implemented to fifty-six EFL learners in a private Ecuadorian University reports into the effects that CLIL methodologies such as scaffolding have as a motivating factor in students’ reading comprehension skills. The subjects were separated into two groups during the academic term in which they were monitored, the experimental (scaffolded) and the control (non-scaffolded) groups. The analysis of the results reveal that the experimental group improved their reading comprehension skills as a result of the scaffolding techniques. The post-study interview also resulted favorable and students reported to have felt motivated during the process.